WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "83271ad3-5b54-40c4-934a-4e65afb7ab08"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 16, "id": "565", "owners": [16], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "565"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000565", "sets": ["71"]}, "author_link": ["1137", "1135", "1136"], "item_1_alternative_title_5": {"attribute_name": "論文名よみ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "ゲンザイ ジユウ イシロン ワ ドコニ ムカッテ イルカ"}]}, "item_1_biblio_info_14": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1998-03-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "155", "bibliographicPageStart": "125", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "38", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "広島修大論集. 人文編"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_6": {"attribute_name": "著者名(日)", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "松田 , 克進"}, {"creatorName": "マツダ, カツノリ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "1135", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_7": {"attribute_name": "著者名よみ", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "マツダ , カツノリ"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "1136", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_8": {"attribute_name": "著者名(英)", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Matuda , Katunori", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "1137", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_description_1": {"attribute_name": "ページ属性", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "P(論文)", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_description_12": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The problem of determinism and freedom is one of the most traditional subjects of philosophy, but in recent decades there has been a great change in the way of philosophizing the problem. This paper has two aims. One is to get a clear view of the change through the works of P. F. Strawson and Ted Honderich. The other is to try to tell what will be at stake in the future free will debate by looking at the recent controversy between Richard Double and T. Honderich. The most important question in the free will debate had been whether the factual concepts of human freedom and moral responsibility were compatible with determinism, before the epoch-making works by Strawson and Honderich were published. At present, many free will theorists are primarily concerned to know whether our attitudes such as gratitude and indignation are compatible with determinism or not. This attitudinal nature is clearly seen in the current free will debate. Double and Honderich shares the same attitudinal stance in approaching the issue of the consequences of determinism, but there is a sheer disagreement of opinion between them, because Double sees no cognitive elements in human attitudes while Honderich asserts that our attitudes contain some factual judgment concerning the initiation of actions. Their controversy suggests that it will be an decisive question in the future free will debate whether our attitudes have cognitive elements or not.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_publisher_19": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "広島修道大学人文学会"}]}, "item_1_source_id_13": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00212913", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_1_text_2": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "論文"}]}, "item_1_text_3": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Article"}]}, "item_1_text_9": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "広島修道大学"}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "1998-03-30"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00004138546.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.6 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1600000.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00004138546", "url": "https://shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/565/files/KJ00004138546.pdf"}, "version_id": "71b0c20b-aa2d-4a87-97ac-14edf851889d"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "現代自由意志論はどこに向かっているか : Honderich vs. Double論争から見えてくること", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "現代自由意志論はどこに向かっているか : Honderich vs. Double論争から見えてくること"}, {"subitem_title": "What Will Be at Stake in the Free Will Debate? : A Prospect from Honderich vs. Double Controversy", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "1", "owner": "16", "path": ["71"], "permalink_uri": "https://shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/565", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "1998-03-30"}, "publish_date": "1998-03-30", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "565", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["現代自由意志論はどこに向かっているか : Honderich vs. Double論争から見えてくること"], "weko_shared_id": 16}
現代自由意志論はどこに向かっているか : Honderich vs. Double論争から見えてくること
https://shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/565
https://shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5652011d2c4-37f9-44cc-8b7e-c70780b00899
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00004138546 (1.6 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 1998-03-30 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 現代自由意志論はどこに向かっているか : Honderich vs. Double論争から見えてくること | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | What Will Be at Stake in the Free Will Debate? : A Prospect from Honderich vs. Double Controversy | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ページ属性 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||
論文 | ||||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||
en | ||||||
Article | ||||||
論文名よみ | ||||||
その他のタイトル | ゲンザイ ジユウ イシロン ワ ドコニ ムカッテ イルカ | |||||
著者名(日) |
松田 , 克進
× 松田 , 克進 |
|||||
著者名よみ |
マツダ , カツノリ
× マツダ , カツノリ |
|||||
著者名(英) |
Matuda , Katunori
× Matuda , Katunori |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
広島修道大学 | ||||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 広島修道大学人文学会 | |||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | The problem of determinism and freedom is one of the most traditional subjects of philosophy, but in recent decades there has been a great change in the way of philosophizing the problem. This paper has two aims. One is to get a clear view of the change through the works of P. F. Strawson and Ted Honderich. The other is to try to tell what will be at stake in the future free will debate by looking at the recent controversy between Richard Double and T. Honderich. The most important question in the free will debate had been whether the factual concepts of human freedom and moral responsibility were compatible with determinism, before the epoch-making works by Strawson and Honderich were published. At present, many free will theorists are primarily concerned to know whether our attitudes such as gratitude and indignation are compatible with determinism or not. This attitudinal nature is clearly seen in the current free will debate. Double and Honderich shares the same attitudinal stance in approaching the issue of the consequences of determinism, but there is a sheer disagreement of opinion between them, because Double sees no cognitive elements in human attitudes while Honderich asserts that our attitudes contain some factual judgment concerning the initiation of actions. Their controversy suggests that it will be an decisive question in the future free will debate whether our attitudes have cognitive elements or not. | |||||
収録物識別子 | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00212913 | |||||
書誌情報 |
広島修大論集. 人文編 巻 38, 号 2, p. 125-155, 発行日 1998-03-30 |