WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
闘う身体はどこで語ればよいのか : 空手の身体と言説の秩序への記号論的一考察
https://shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/634
https://shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/634b0c6f574-5b49-499b-bbbf-c387a82cc3f8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004138615 (1.0 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 1999-09-30 | |||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||
| タイトル | 闘う身体はどこで語ればよいのか : 空手の身体と言説の秩序への記号論的一考察 | |||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||
| タイトル | Where should the body to fight be addressed? : One consideration by applying semiotics to the body of Karate and the order of statement | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||||
| 論文 | ||||||||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||||
| en | ||||||||||||||
| Article | ||||||||||||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | タタカウ カラダ ワ ドコデ カタレバ ヨイノカ | |||||||||||||
| 著者名(日) |
大山 , 智徳
× 大山 , 智徳
× 湯淺 , 良之助
|
|||||||||||||
| 著者名よみ |
オオヤマ , トモノリ
× オオヤマ , トモノリ
× ユアサ , リュウノスケ
|
|||||||||||||
| 著者名(英) |
Ooyama , Tomonori
× Ooyama , Tomonori
× Yuasa , Ryounosuke
|
|||||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||||
| 日本社会学会 | ||||||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||||
| 広島修道大学 | ||||||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島修道大学人文学会 | |||||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to show the phase that deals an object called the body to fight. The object is the body of Karate as martial arts, and semiotics is used as a method. The concept of three aspects of a sign is consisted of the relations between signifiant and signifie. One is called solid-sign, and it is asymmetrical and has one direction. Another is closed-sign, and it alternates in two directions. The last one is open-sign, which aims at other signs. If this concept is applied to the body, the concept of a passive body, an active body, and a difference body can be derived respectively. Moreover, the body which refers to these objects is also the body itself. Then, when three aspects of a sign were applied also to this relationship, the concept of solid-sign of statement, closed-sign of statement, and open-sign of statement was derived. If an object is open-sign, it will prove that only the open-sign of statement is suitable for taking it up. Incidentally, the body to fight contains the body that makes the open-sign a principle. As mentioned above, it comes to the conclusion that the open-sign of statement is optimum for addressing the body to fight. | |||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00212913 | |||||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
広島修大論集. 人文編 巻 40, 号 1, p. 17-39, 発行日 1999-09-30 |
|||||||||||||
