@article{oai:shudo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000779,
 author = {大庭 , 宣尊 and オオバ , ノブタカ and Ooba , Nobutaka},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {広島修大論集. 人文編},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {P(論文), In societies where racism and certain kinds of discrimination are officially defined as unjust, people have, or at least are expected to have, the normative knowledge that 'racism and/or discrimination are unjust'. However, a sharing of the normative knowledge alone can not guarantee that racism and discrimination will be overcome. How are discriminatory relationships constructed and sustained in everyday life? To answer this question, I will mainly discuss how discriminatory relationships are approved, sided, justified and reproduced in everyday life, by analyzing narratives and discourses on discrimination against Buraku people in Japan, and racism against Aboriginal people in Australia. Through the comparative analysis, we can find out common ways of excluding a certain category as "Other" and justification of the action in these societies. 1) The assumption that here is none of the discriminated, 2) the reversed relationship between offenders and sufferers, 3) asymmetric relationships and the social stock of knowledge that justify the relationship, 4) seduction to complicity. Also, we can argue that if we want to overcome injustice like as discrimination and racism, so on, we should learn not only "vocabularies of values" but also "vocabularies of motives" used for justification of exclusion-discrimination.},
 pages = {15--38},
 title = {差別と知識 : "差別と教育" の比較教育社会学へ向けて},
 volume = {44},
 year = {2003},
 yomi = {オオバ, ノブタカ}
}